Business and premises owners recently received some good news from the Michigan Supreme Court.
On April 14, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Ragnoli v North Oakland-North Macomb Imaging, Inc. that:
“notwithstanding low lighting in the parking lot, the presence of wintry weather
conditions and of ice on the ground elsewhere in the premises rendered the
risk of a black ice patch “open and obvious such that a reasonably prudent
person would foresee the danger” of slipping and falling in the parking lot.”
In rendering its decision in Ragnoli, the Supreme Court reversed a previously unpublished Michigan Court of Appeals ruling, which had reversed the trial court’s granting of a motion for summary disposition indicating that there were questions of fact as to whether the black ice was open and obvious given evidence of poor lighting.
While premises owners must always maintain safe conditions, the Supreme Court’s ruling reinforces the notion that ice and snow are open and obvious during cold and wintry seasons.
Add a comment
Subscribe
RSSTopics
- Premises Liability
- Civil Litigation
- Property Liability
- Litigation Discovery
- Insurance
- Appellate Law
- Fire Claims
- Residential Liability
- General Liability
- insurance policy
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Commercial Liability
- Water Loss Claims
- Fraud Activity
- Retail Liability
- Investigations
- Governmental Immunity
- Contractor Liability
- Marine Liability
- Maritime Law
- Artificial Intelligence
- Commercial Real Estate
- Open & Obvious Doctrine
- Design Defect
- Snow & Ice Claims
- Lost Earnings
- Industrial Liability
- Video Recording
- Defamation
- Open & Obvious
- Risk Management
- Liquor Liability
- Professional Liability
- Business Risk Management
- Negligence
- Independent Medical Examinations (IME)
- Sports-liability
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Auto Liability
- Bankruptcy
- Intoxication
- Judicial Estoppel
- No Fault Liability
- Trucking Liability
- Wrongful Death
- Real Estate
- FDA Regulations
- Food Law
- Foodservice & Hospitality
- Regulatory Law
- Constructive Notice
Recent Updates
- Post-Open and Obvious: What Property Owners Can Do to Protect Themselves
- Lessons in Civil Procedure and Civility from a Surprising Source: Barbie
- ‘Open and Obvious’ Falls, Restoring Focus on ‘Notice’ Defense in Michigan Premises Liability Cases
- Insurance Provider’s ‘Satisfaction’ Maketh the Proof of Loss
- The High Seas and High Risks of Lithium Batteries
- Uniform Trade Practices Act Requires Timely Payment of Property Claims
- Michigan Supreme Court Eliminates 'Open and Obvious' Defense in Premises Liability Cases
- Failure to Pay First-Party Property Claims Timely Can Prove Costly Under the Uniform Trade Practices Act
- Is Artificial Intelligence Jeopardizing the Attorney-Client Privilege in Your Case?
- Property Claims Professionals can Minimize Paying Penalty Interest by Doing This