Posts in Retail Liability.
Investigating a plaintiff’s prior suits may reveal contrary positions barring a claim through judicial estoppel.
Tags: Auto Liability, Judicial Estoppel, Motor Vehicle Liability, No Fault Liability, Premises Liability, Retail Liability, Trucking Liability
Comments
Subscribe
RSSTopics
- No Fault Liability
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Transportation
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP)
- Auto Liability
- Appellate Law
- Trucking Liability
- Insurance
- insurance policy
- Civil Litigation
- Fraud Activity
- Sanctions
- Premises Liability
- Coronavirus
- COVID-19
- Cargo Liability
- Judicial Estoppel
- Retail Liability
- Driver Exclusion
- Bankruptcy
- Risk Management
- Public Policy
- Governmental Immunity
- Environmental Legislation
- Environmental Regulation
- Medicare Issues
Recent Updates
- Case Update: Appellate Court Updates Recent Decision to Published Status, Expanding Definition of ‘Unlawful’ Under Michigan PIP Law
- Having a ‘Cowboy Attitude' About No-Fault Insurance Limits Could Cost You
- How well do you Know Your Policyholders? Recent Appellate Case Encourages Full Discovery of Potential Rescission During Litigation
- Published Opinion Warns Insurers that Medical Claims can Survive MCL 500.3145 Indefinitely Without an Appropriate Denial
- Michigan Court of Appeals Outlines Several Important Defenses in Family Member Provided Attendant Care Cases
- Michigan Appellate Courts Help Define ‘Sudden Emergency’ in Motor Vehicle Liability Cases
- Post-Judgement Collection Techniques for Insurers
- Are Case Evaluation Sanctions Gone Baby, Gone?
- Michigan No-Fault Act Requires Diligent and Timely Action by all Parties
- Michigan Supreme Court Rules 2019 No-Fault Act Amendments not Retroactive