Posts in Fraud Activity.
Paying the debts of another is complicated business, especially under Michigan’s version of the statute of frauds.
Comments
The conversion of money is one of those things lawyers get wrong, particularly in business litigation.
Despite careful review, fraudulent inducements can jeopardize otherwise well-crafted contracts.
Subscribe
RSS
Topics
- Commercial Liability
- Business Torts
- Contracts
- Commercial Real Estate
- Business Risk Management
- Commercial Leasing
- Bankruptcy
- Real Estate
- Civil Litigation
- Cryptocurrency
- Regulatory Law
- Coronavirus
- COVID-19
- Real Estate Mortgages
- Commercial Loans
- Mortgage Foreclosure
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Shareholder Liability
- Damages Recovery
- privacy
- Risk Management
- Insurance
- Tax Law
- Fraud Activity
- Cyber Attack
- Class Action
- Product Liability
- Pensions
- Standing
- Cybersecurity
- Biometric Data
- Banking Law
- Statute of Limitations
- e-Discovery
- Noncompete Agreements
- e-Commerce
- Internet Law
- Residential Liability
- Venue
- Zoning and Planning
- Consumer Protection
- Clawback
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Receiverships
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Garnishments
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Unfair Competition
- Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
Recent Updates
- Wait, I Have to Pay my Own Attorney? But I Won the Case?
- Preliminary Injunctions in Michigan, the More They Change the More They Stay the Same
- President Biden Signs Cryptocurrency Executive Order Establishing Whole-of-Government Approach to Regulating Digital Assets Industry
- My 5 Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Am I at Fault for Breach of Contract if the Other Party Breached It First?
- Maximizing Damages Recovery in Michigan's District Courts Challenged by Jurisdiction Limits
- Proliferation of Security Cameras, Drones Doesn't Necessarily Reduce Reasonable Expectation of Privacy Under the Law
- Does Sympathy or Empathy Have a Place in the Courtroom?
- No Light Yet at End of COVID-19 Real Estate Tunnel
- When are Clear, Unambiguous Contracts Nonetheless Ambiguous?