The Michigan Court of Appeals, in Windrush, Inc v Vanpopering, Case No. 315958 (June 19, 2014), concluded that a plaintiff can maintain an action for statutory conversion stemming from a defendant’s alleged violation of the Michigan Builders’ Trust Fund Act (MBTFA).
The appellate court observed that nothing in the MBTFA indicates a legislative attempt to fashion an exclusive remedy for a trust fund violation, quite the contrary.
Similarly, when drafting MCL 600.2919a, the Michigan Legislature provided that a statutory conversion claim can be made “in addition to any other right or remedy” provided by law or otherwise.
Therefore, while claims for the conversion of money – as would be the case when combining a claim under MBTFA with §2919a – are often difficult to prove given the unique evidentiary hurdles §2919a mandates, the Windrush decision makes clear such a claim is wholly permitted and is in keeping with the remedial provisions of the MBTFA.
PartnerMatthew J. Boettcher is a partner in the firm’s Bloomfield Hills office and a member of Plunkett Cooney’s Commercial Litigation Practice Group. He concentrates his practice in the area of commercial litigation with ...
Add a comment
Subscribe
RSS
Topics
- Tax Law
- Commercial Liability
- Personal Tax Controversy
- Business Tax Controversy
- Business Risk Management
- Contracts
- Business Torts
- Commercial Real Estate
- Property tax
- Commercial Loans
- Commercial Leasing
- Civil Litigation
- COVID-19
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Banking Law
- Bankruptcy
- Standing
- Lending
- Real Estate
- Real Estate Mortgages
- Coronavirus
- Facilitation
- Appellate Law
- Mortgage Foreclosure
- Trade Secrets
- Litigation Discovery
- Corporate Formation
- Risk Management
- Fraud Activity
- Shareholder Liability
- Cyber Attack
- Cryptocurrency
- Regulatory Law
- Insurance
- Damages Recovery
- privacy
- Cybersecurity
- Statute of Limitations
- Class Action
- Product Liability
- Pensions
- Biometric Data
- e-Discovery
- Noncompete Agreements
- e-Commerce
- Internet Law
- Consumer Protection
- Residential Liability
- Venue
- Zoning and Planning
- Clawback
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Receiverships
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Garnishments
- Unfair Competition
- Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
Recent Updates
- What is 'Currently Non-collectible' Status and how do you get it Applied to Your Federal Income Taxes?
- Offer-in-Compromise or Partial Pay Installment Agreement – Which Option is Right For You?
- Offer in Compromise Programs Provide Taxpayers with Options to Settle Federal, State Tax Debt
- IRS and State Payment Plan Options - Part 1: The Installment Agreement
- What can Homeowners do When Property Taxes are too High?
- Understanding the Michigan Property Tax Appeals Process for Commercial, Industrial Properties
- 6 New Year’s 'Business Resolutions' Worth Considering
- What You Can do Now to Prepare for an IRS Employee Retention Credit Audit
- Calling Blanket Purchase Order a “Requirement Contract” in Supplier of Goods Dispute Doesn’t Make it so
- Understanding the 3 Options for IRS Notice Compliance