In the age of online retail and grocery shopping, many people still join warehouse clubs for additional savings. As part of their warehouse memberships, customers may agree to certain terms, including their willingness to arbitrate and forego filing a lawsuit when a dispute arises.
In Century Plastics, LLC v Frimo, Inc, unpublished opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued Jan. 30 (Docket No. 347535), 2020 WL 504977, the appellate court affirmed the circuit court’s granting of summary disposition for the defendant on the basis that the parties had an agreement to arbitrate.
“Defendant having incorporated the General Terms into the parties’ contract, under the unambiguous language of this provision, defendant had the power to compel arbitration of disputes arising under the contract. Plaintiff assented to the terms of the price quotation, and it did not raise any concerns” as to the applicability of the General Terms.
In light of this decision, warehouse clubs should review their terms and conditions and consider whether to remove a lawsuit from an unfavorable, plaintiff-friendly venue and place it into arbitration, where the fact-finder arbitrator may be more well-informed as to the law and can then apply that knowledge to the facts of whatever dispute arises between the parties.
As Benjamin Franklin said, “When will mankind be convinced and agree to settle their difficulties by arbitration?” With more and more stories of runaway juries, that time may be now.
A partner in the firm's Bloomfield Hills office, Abe Barlaskar concentrates his litigation practice on defending insurers and personal line carriers, rental car companies, trucking companies, corporations and municipalities ...
Add a comment
- Residential Liability
- General Liability
- Property Liability
- insurance policy
- Litigation Discovery
- Civil Litigation
- Premises Liability
- Retail Liability
- Commercial Real Estate
- Professional Liability
- Open & Obvious Doctrine
- Snow & Ice Claims
- Open & Obvious
- Liquor Liability
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Risk Management
- Independent Medical Examinations (IME)
- Contractor Liability
- Business Risk Management
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Commercial Liability
- Auto Liability
- Judicial Estoppel
- No Fault Liability
- Trucking Liability
- Wrongful Death
- Real Estate
- FDA Regulations
- Food Law
- Foodservice & Hospitality
- Regulatory Law
- Constructive Notice
- Governmental Immunity
- Will Insurance Pay When Others Intentionally Play Property ‘Games?’
- Thorough Pre-Litigation Investigations Form Bedrock of Dipositive Motions
- Appellate Court Reverses Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Insurance Agent
- Indiana Supreme Court Rules Store Managers Cannot be Held Negligent for Accidents in Which They Played no Part
- Open and Obvious Doctrine Remains Alive, but for How Long?
- Court Ruling Bans Cameras, Allows Observers for Independent Medical Exams
- Appellate Court ‘Loans’ Temporary Possessory Rights to Contractor, Allowing it to Assert Premises Liability Defenses
- Appellate Court Holds Sporting Event Rules Violations Not Necessarily Reckless Misconduct
- Warehouse Clubs Should Consider Arbitration for Member Disputes
- Truck Driver’s Bodily Injury Claim Barred by his Bankruptcy Case