Posts in Civil Litigation.
A recent Michigan Court of Appeals ruling bans video recording but allows in-person observers for independent medical examinations.
Comments
With U.S. tort litigation continuing to climb to historic levels, arbitration may offer insurance providers lower costs, better venue option for resolving claims.
Subscribe
RSS Plunkett Cooney LinkedIn Page Plunkett Cooney Twitter Page Plunkett Cooney Facebook PageTopics
- Premises Liability
- Retail Liability
- Litigation Discovery
- General Liability
- Residential Liability
- Civil Litigation
- Commercial Real Estate
- Negligence
- Open & Obvious Doctrine
- Independent Medical Examinations (IME)
- Snow & Ice Claims
- Contractor Liability
- Property Liability
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Liquor Liability
- Open & Obvious
- Sports-liability
- Risk Management
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Commercial Liability
- Business Risk Management
- Auto Liability
- Bankruptcy
- Judicial Estoppel
- No Fault Liability
- Trucking Liability
- Intoxication
- Wrongful Death
- Real Estate
- FDA Regulations
- Food Law
- Foodservice & Hospitality
- Regulatory Law
- Constructive Notice
- Governmental Immunity
Recent Updates
- Indiana Supreme Court Rules Store Managers Cannot be Held Negligent for Accidents in Which They Played no Part
- Open and Obvious Doctrine Remains Alive, but for How Long?
- Court Ruling Bans Cameras, Allows Observers for Independent Medical Exams
- Appellate Court ‘Loans’ Temporary Possessory Rights to Contractor, Allowing it to Assert Premises Liability Defenses
- Appellate Court Holds Sporting Event Rules Violations Not Necessarily Reckless Misconduct
- Warehouse Clubs Should Consider Arbitration for Member Disputes
- Truck Driver’s Bodily Injury Claim Barred by his Bankruptcy Case
- Intoxication Bars College Student’s Estate from Wrongful Death Action
- New Supreme Court Discovery Rule Places Emphasis on Proportionality Over Relevance
- Court Reinforces Principle That Landowners Generally Have no Duty to Prevent Criminal Acts