Business and premises owners recently received some good news from the Michigan Supreme Court.
On April 14, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Ragnoli v North Oakland-North Macomb Imaging, Inc. that:
“notwithstanding low lighting in the parking lot, the presence of wintry weather
conditions and of ice on the ground elsewhere in the premises rendered the
risk of a black ice patch “open and obvious such that a reasonably prudent
person would foresee the danger” of slipping and falling in the parking lot.”
In rendering its decision in Ragnoli, the Supreme Court reversed a previously unpublished Michigan Court of Appeals ruling, which had reversed the trial court’s granting of a motion for summary disposition indicating that there were questions of fact as to whether the black ice was open and obvious given evidence of poor lighting.
While premises owners must always maintain safe conditions, the Supreme Court’s ruling reinforces the notion that ice and snow are open and obvious during cold and wintry seasons.
- Partner
Christopher J. Scott is a partner in the firm's Flint office who focuses his practice in all areas of law concerning personal injury, property damage or commercial liability, including premises liability, construction liability ...
Add a comment
Subscribe
RSSTopics
- Civil Litigation
- Litigation Discovery
- Premises Liability
- Property Liability
- Video Recording
- Water Loss Claims
- Residential Liability
- Defamation
- General Liability
- Insurance
- Fire Claims
- insurance policy
- Retail Liability
- Commercial Real Estate
- Open & Obvious Doctrine
- Snow & Ice Claims
- Professional Liability
- Open & Obvious
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Liquor Liability
- Risk Management
- Negligence
- Independent Medical Examinations (IME)
- Business Risk Management
- Contractor Liability
- Sports-liability
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Commercial Liability
- Auto Liability
- Bankruptcy
- Intoxication
- Judicial Estoppel
- No Fault Liability
- Trucking Liability
- Wrongful Death
- Real Estate
- FDA Regulations
- Food Law
- Foodservice & Hospitality
- Regulatory Law
- Constructive Notice
- Governmental Immunity
Recent Updates
- Michigan Court of Appeals Rules Neuropsychological Exams May be Video Recorded
- Water Pipes Provide Evidence of Fraudulent Water Loss Claims
- Defamatory Google Review? What to Know Before Bringing Legal Action Against Anonymous Online Users for Defamation in Michigan
- Is Water the New Face of Arson?
- ‘Tis the Season for Fraudulent Water Loss Claims
- Did You Notice the Notice in Your Pending Fire Claim Notice?
- Will Insurance Pay When Others Intentionally Play Property ‘Games?’
- Thorough Pre-Litigation Investigations Form Bedrock of Dispositive Motions
- Appellate Court Reverses Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Insurance Agent
- Indiana Supreme Court Rules Store Managers Cannot be Held Negligent for Accidents in Which They Played no Part