The United States Department of Labor (DOL) was handed a major loss this month by a federal court in Texas regarding overtime rules for white collar workers.
The DOL previously raised the minimum salary level for white-collar employees exempt from overtime payments to the equivalent of $43,888 per year, with a second increase to $58,656 per year set to take effect on Jan. 1, 2025.
Last Friday, a federal judge in Texas struck down the DOL’s latest attempt to raise the minimum salary thresholds, finding that the rule exceeded the agency’s statutory authority.
DOL rules require that “white collar” employees exempt from overtime payments meet certain criteria to be considered exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). One requirement is a minimum level of annual salary. The State of Texas and more than a dozen business organizations filed suit to block the implementation of the rule.
Notably, the Texas court reviewed the case under the new standard for agency review outlined in the June 2024 Supreme Court of the United States decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which held that federal courts must exercise independent judgment in deciding whether an agency acted within its statutory authority and may not simply defer to the agency’s interpretation of ambiguities in the law. The Texas court found that the salary basis part of the test cannot subsume the other factors regarding exempt classification, including the “duties” part of the test.
The ruling vacates the DOL’s rule in its entirety nationwide, including the increase that went into effect on July 1, 2024. As a result, the salary threshold exempt status reverts back to the DOL’s 2019 rule, which set the white-collar salary exemption at $684 per week, or $35,568 annually, and the highly compensated employee exemption at $107,432 per year.
Employers are advised to contact their employment attorneys for further guidance and information about how to navigate this most recent ruling under the FLSA.
- Partner
A member of Plunkett Cooney's Labor & Employment Law Practice Group, Christina L. Corl has extensive litigation and trial experience defending clients in state and federal court disputes involving employment issues, commercial ...
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Labor Law
- At Will Employment
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Wage & Hour
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Arbitration
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Minimum Wage
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- COVID-19
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Noncompete Agreements
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Civil Rights
- Contract Employees
- Regulatory Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Title VII
- Earned Sick Time
- OSHA Issues
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Tax Law
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Workplace Harassment
- Transgender Issues
- Unemployment Benefits
- Contracts
- Federal Trade Commission
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Business Risk Management
- Hostile Work Environment
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Public Education
- Cannabis
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements





