According to Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charge statistics, workplace harassment is alleged in approximately 30 percent of all charges filed with the commission.
As a result of this fact, the EEOC and new Chair Jenny R. Yang announced on Jan. 14 the commission's intent to focus on workplace harassment in 2015.
“Today, we continue to see systemic barriers to equal opportunity in many areas, including hiring, persistent harassment and increased retaliation,” wrote Yang in a statement released prior to the hearing. “This . . . presents an opportune time for a call to action – to enlist employers and workers in a broader effort to prevent and correct workplace discrimination and to identify real-world solutions for our most difficult workplace challenges.”
In addition, Yang announced the creation of a new task force that will be dedicated solely to harassment issues. Yang explained, “Through this task force we hope to better reach workers to ensure they know their rights and to better reach employers to promote best practices,” according to a statement issued by the EEOC on the hearing.
The EEOC’s recent statement regarding its focus on workplace harassment illuminates the reality that workplace harassment is still a major problem that employers need to strategically work to prevent.
It is critical that employers have a clear anti-harassment and discrimination policy that is communicated understandably to all employees. Now is the best time for employers to review their policies, training and investigative procedures.
- Partner
Courtney L. Nichols serves as the leader of Plunkett Cooney’s Litigation Department, and she is a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Practice Group. Ms. Nichols also has the distinction of serving as a member of the Board ...
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Labor Law
- At Will Employment
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Wage & Hour
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Arbitration
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Minimum Wage
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- COVID-19
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Noncompete Agreements
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Civil Rights
- Contract Employees
- Regulatory Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Title VII
- Earned Sick Time
- OSHA Issues
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Tax Law
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Workplace Harassment
- Transgender Issues
- Unemployment Benefits
- Contracts
- Federal Trade Commission
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Business Risk Management
- Hostile Work Environment
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Public Education
- Cannabis
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements





