The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), on Sept. 25, 2014, filed two lawsuits seeking protection of transgendered people in the workplace.
Specifically, the EEOC accused a Michigan funeral home and a Florida eye clinic of illegally firing employees who were transitioning from male to female in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
In its lawsuit filed against the Florida eye clinic, the EEOC alleges that the defendant’s employee performed her duties satisfactorily throughout her employment and was fired only after she began to present (i.e., dress) as a woman and informed her employer that she was transgender.
Likewise, in its case against the Michigan the funeral home, the EEOC alleges that the funeral home employee always adequately performed her duties in the position of funeral director/embalmer but was suddenly fired two weeks after she advised her employer that she was undergoing a gender transition from male to female and would soon start to dress in appropriate female business attire, consistent with her gender identity as a woman.
According to the EEOC, the alleged actions of the employers violate Title VII, which prohibits sex discrimination, including that based on gender stereotyping. EEOC Indianapolis Regional Attorney Laurie Young stated “Title VII prohibits employers from firing employees because they do not behave according to the employer’s stereotypes of how men and women should act, and this includes employees who present themselves according to their gender identity.”
These lawsuits further emphasize the EEOC’s ongoing efforts to implement its Strategic Enforcement Plan, which includes “coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals under Title VII’s sex discrimination provisions, as they may apply” as one of the EEOC’s top enforcement priorities.
For additional information, find the EEOC press releases regarding these two lawsuits here (http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-25-14d.cfm) and here (http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-25-14e.cfm).
A member of the firm's Bloomfield Hills office, Courtney L. Nichols serves as Co-Leader of Plunkett Cooney's Labor and Employment Law Practice Group.
Ms. Nichols focuses her litigation practice in the area of employment law ...
Add a comment
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Human Resources
- Employment Agreement
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Wage & Hour
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Employment Discrimination
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Noncompete Agreements
- OSHA Issues
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Title VII
- National Labor Relations Act
- Sick Leave
- Workplace Harassment
- Regulatory Law
- Unemployment Benefits
- Minimum Wage
- Workers' Compensation
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Transgender Issues
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Sexual Harassment
- Civil Rights
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- Class Actions
- Emergency Information
- Business Risk Management
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Hostile Work Environment
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Tax Law
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- Employment Noncompete Agreements Enforced Badly
- Feds Release New COVID-19 Vaccination Rules for Large Employers, Medicare/Medicaid Providers
- The Challenge of Wage Claims Under the Equal Pay Act
- Was the bar for Actionable Federal Discrimination Claims Just Lowered?
- Poor Drafting Leads to Poor Results for Arbitration 'Agreement'
- One, Two, Three Strikes You’re OUT… When Dealing With Attendance Rules!
- Failure To Apply Duties Test Results in Ruling Against Employer in Wage Claim Appeal
- MIOSHA Suspends May 24 Rule, Makes COVID-19 Mitigation Measures Discretionary for Non-Health Care Employers
- ‘VACC To Normal’ Means Back to the Office for Michigan Starting May 24
- Michigan Pushes to Pandemic Finish Line by Promoting Double Vaccine Benefit