As expected with the surge in COVID-19 cases in the state, the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA) has extended its emergency rules for six months.
Recently, I have been receiving numerous calls from clients asking if they can require employees to return to in person work. Some clients asked if they could at least return those workers who are now fully vaccinated.
The short answer is no, not if the work the employers are doing can “feasibly be completed remotely.” Rule 5 (8). Unless the order is withdrawn, remote work whenever feasible will continue to be the rule through Oct. 14.
Employers need to remember that, even if your entire workforce has received the COVID vaccination, it is not 100% effective and with the COVID variants now dominating the cases in Michigan, the vaccinations, regardless of manufacturer, may be less effective than originally predicted.
Bottom line, if an employee has been performing their job from home and has been doing a reasonably good job at completing their tasks, they should continue to do so. It is not just for the safety of your workforce it remains the law and MIOSHA has been stepping up its enforcement. Should you question the enforcement of these rules, MIOSHA posts COVID-19 Citations on its “dashboard.”
While my primary purpose in writing this article is reinforcing the remote work rule, all of the Emergency Rules - Coronavirus Disease 2019 remain effective through mid-October. That means that employers must maintain all of the requisite safety measures until then, including those required to be in their preparedness and response plan (administrative controls, basic infection/prevention measures, providing personal protective equipment, health surveillance of worker, training, etc.).
These measures are important for the health and safety of workers who must perform their duties in the workplace, including those who work with the public.
- Of Counsel
An of counsel attorney in the firm’s Detroit office, Claudia D. Orr exclusively represents and advises employers and management in employment and labor law matters.
Ms. Orr has an ever-growing practice in Alternative Dispute ...
Add a comment
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Employment Discrimination
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Wage & Hour
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Minimum Wage
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Agreement
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Regulatory Law
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- OSHA Issues
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- Title VII
- Sick Leave
- Workplace Harassment
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Noncompete Agreements
- National Labor Relations Board
- Department of Justice
- Transgender Issues
- Workers' Compensation
- Medicare Issues
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Unemployment Benefits
- Sexual Harassment
- Class Actions
- Civil Rights
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Tax Law
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- Court Delays Ruling on Fate of Michigan’s Paid Sick Leave, Minimum Wage Laws Until February 2023
- Michigan Supreme Court Affirms State’s Civil Right Law Prohibits Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation
- DOJ Issues Guidance on ADA, Opioid Crisis Issues
- Congress Passes Law, With Retroactive Effect, to Invalidate Forced Arbitration Provisions at the Employee’s Election
- U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Implementation of Vaccine Requirement for Large Businesses
- Contractual Limitations Periods STILL Alive and Well... on job Applications!
- Federal Appellate Court Takes Brakes Off COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Carousel
- Employers: Hang on for Another Spin Around the Vaccine Mandate Carousel
- Stray Comments can Lead to Employer Liability
- President Biden's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Face Uncertain Future