Pursuant to a new Department of Labor (“DOL”) rule, employees in legal, same-sex marriages will soon have the same rights as employees in opposite-sex marriages to federally-protected job leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
The final rule changing existing policy under the FMLA will take effect on March 27. Currently, 37 states and Washington, D.C. recognize same-sex marriages.
The final rule changes the definition of a spouse under FMLA regulations from a “state of residence” rule to a “place of celebration” rule. In sum, if the place where the employee was married recognizes same-sex marriages as legal, the employee is entitled to take FMLA leave to care for his or her spouse or family member, regardless of where he or she currently resides.
In addition, the final rule expressly includes within the definition of spouse individuals in marriages that were validly-entered into outside of the United States, if they could have been entered into in at least one state.
All employers, including Michigan employers, must understand that available rights under the FMLA now extend to all eligible employees in same-sex and common-law marriages, regardless of the current status of Michigan’s (or the employer’s particular state’s) marriage laws.
In addition, employers should update their current FMLA policies to ensure they are congruent with the Final Rule prior to March 27, 2015.
A member of the firm's Bloomfield Hills office, Courtney L. Nichols serves as Co-Leader of Plunkett Cooney's Labor and Employment Law Practice Group.
Ms. Nichols focuses her litigation practice in the area of employment law ...
Add a comment
SubscribeRSS Plunkett Cooney LinkedIn Page Plunkett Cooney Twitter Page Plunkett Cooney Facebook Page
- Employment Liability
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Human Resources
- Wage & Hour
- Title VII
- Labor Law
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Employment Agreement
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- Employment Discrimination
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Minimum Wage
- National Labor Relations Board
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Transgender Issues
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Sick Leave
- Hostile Work Environment
- Class Actions
- Workplace Harassment
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Tax Law
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- Lessons Learned – Part Three – The Oral Contract
- Lessons Learned – Part Two – Punitive Damages
- Lessons Learned Series - Part One - No-fault Attendance Policies
- DOL Gets Granular on Rounding of Employees’ Time
- Federal Appellate Court Finds Potential USERRA Violations
- Employers Must File EEO-1 Survey with Pay Data by Sept. 30
- Adopt and Amend? Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Paid Medical Leave, Improved Workforce Opportunity Acts
- New ADA Case Is Great For Employers
- Michigan Legislature Challenges its Own Lame Duck Amendments to Paid Sick Time, Minimum Wage Rate Laws
- Supreme Court Rules EEOC Charge not Jurisdictional Requirement for Bringing Civil Rights Claims in Federal Court