Pursuant to a new Department of Labor (“DOL”) rule, employees in legal, same-sex marriages will soon have the same rights as employees in opposite-sex marriages to federally-protected job leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).
The final rule changing existing policy under the FMLA will take effect on March 27. Currently, 37 states and Washington, D.C. recognize same-sex marriages.
The final rule changes the definition of a spouse under FMLA regulations from a “state of residence” rule to a “place of celebration” rule. In sum, if the place where the employee was married recognizes same-sex marriages as legal, the employee is entitled to take FMLA leave to care for his or her spouse or family member, regardless of where he or she currently resides.
In addition, the final rule expressly includes within the definition of spouse individuals in marriages that were validly-entered into outside of the United States, if they could have been entered into in at least one state.
All employers, including Michigan employers, must understand that available rights under the FMLA now extend to all eligible employees in same-sex and common-law marriages, regardless of the current status of Michigan’s (or the employer’s particular state’s) marriage laws.
In addition, employers should update their current FMLA policies to ensure they are congruent with the Final Rule prior to March 27, 2015.
A member of the firm's Bloomfield Hills office, Courtney L. Nichols serves as Co-Leader of Plunkett Cooney's Labor and Employment Law Practice Group.
Ms. Nichols focuses her litigation practice in the area of employment law ...
Add a comment
SubscribeRSS Plunkett Cooney LinkedIn Page Plunkett Cooney Twitter Page Plunkett Cooney Facebook Page
- Employment Liability
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Wage & Hour
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Labor Law
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Discrimination
- Human Resources
- Employment Agreement
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- OSHA Issues
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Title VII
- National Labor Relations Act
- Workplace Harassment
- Sick Leave
- Unemployment Benefits
- Regulatory Law
- Workers' Compensation
- Minimum Wage
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Transgender Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Civil Rights
- Non-compete Agreements
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- Class Actions
- Emergency Information
- Business Risk Management
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Hostile Work Environment
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Tax Law
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- The Challenge of Wage Claims Under the Equal Pay Act
- Was the bar for Actionable Federal Discrimination Claims Just Lowered?
- Poor Drafting Leads to Poor Results for Arbitration 'Agreement'
- One, Two, Three Strikes You’re OUT… When Dealing With Attendance Rules!
- Failure To Apply Duties Test Results in Ruling Against Employer in Wage Claim Appeal
- MIOSHA Suspends May 24 Rule, Makes COVID-19 Mitigation Measures Discretionary for Non-Health Care Employers
- ‘VACC To Normal’ Means Back to the Office for Michigan Starting May 24
- Michigan Pushes to Pandemic Finish Line by Promoting Double Vaccine Benefit
- Contractual Limitations Periods and Federal Civil Rights Claims
- Remote Work Still Required Amid Covid-19 Surge in Michigan