Posts in Workplace Harassment.
With these tips, sexual harassment won’t be the Grinch that steals your company’s holiday cheer.
Comments
Appellate court ruling underscores the value of a good employment application.
EEOC's focus on harassment claims means the time is right for employers to review anti-harassment policies, training and procedures.
Subscribe
RSS Plunkett Cooney LinkedIn Page Plunkett Cooney Twitter Page Plunkett Cooney Facebook Page
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Human Resources
- Wage & Hour
- Labor Law
- Employment Discrimination
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Title VII
- National Labor Relations Act
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Employment Agreement
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Contracts
- Minimum Wage
- National Labor Relations Board
- Retaliation
- Transgender Issues
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Sick Leave
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Hostile Work Environment
- Workplace Harassment
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Tax Law
- Cannabis
- Medical Marijuana
- ERISA
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Lessons Learned – Part Three – The Oral Contract
- Lessons Learned – Part Two – Punitive Damages
- Lessons Learned Series - Part One - No-fault Attendance Policies
- DOL Gets Granular on Rounding of Employees’ Time
- Federal Appellate Court Finds Potential USERRA Violations
- Employers Must File EEO-1 Survey with Pay Data by Sept. 30
- Adopt and Amend? Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Paid Medical Leave, Improved Workforce Opportunity Acts
- New ADA Case Is Great For Employers
- Michigan Legislature Challenges its Own Lame Duck Amendments to Paid Sick Time, Minimum Wage Rate Laws
- Supreme Court Rules EEOC Charge not Jurisdictional Requirement for Bringing Civil Rights Claims in Federal Court