Normally I write about bad news for employers to keep them current on what not to do. But this time, I’m starting off the new year by turning over a new leaf and writing about Cann v Elite Plastic Products Inc, an unpublished opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals to remind employers what they must do! You’re welcome.
In this case, the plaintiff argued that the six-month limitations period on the job application was unenforceable because it was a contract of adhesion, unfair, against public policy and unconscionable. You see, this plaintiff was fired, allegedly wrongfully, on Jan. 20, 2017 but he didn’t file his lawsuit until Jan. 16, 2020. But for the six-month limitations period on the employment application, most employment claims could have been brought within three years, and his complaint would have squeaked in just under the wire.
The plaintiff argued that the appellate court should ignore the Michigan Supreme Court’s binding decision by that court’s majority in Rory v Continental Ins Co, 473 Mich 457 (2005) and follow the decision of the dissent. Not a strong argument to make considering, well, quite frankly, the published opinion was binding!
The plaintiff also asked the appellate court to ignore its own published opinion in Clark v DaimlerChrysler Corp, 268 Mich App 138 (2005). There was no doubt that the plaintiff was going to lose. When I read opinion, I was wondering if the end game was to take the issue to the Michigan Supreme Court and ask it to reconsider the issue. Time will tell if that is the strategy.
So, bottom line, employers can still include a six-month contractual limitations period on its employment application and they should! There have been may times over the years that my clients could have had a quick victory had they included such a limitations period. Even union members can be bound by a contractual limitations period to which they agree prior to being hired and joining the union.
The key is to make sure the contractual limitations period language is written correctly, so that it can be enforced by a court. Also key is that it must be on the employment application and not in the employee handbook which generally states “nothing in this handbook creates any contractual obligations” somewhere in its introduction.
If you don’t have a limitations period spelled out on your company’s employment application, consult with an experienced employment attorney today. By tomorrow you may find you're too late!
- Of Counsel
An of counsel attorney in the firm’s Detroit office, Claudia D. Orr exclusively represents and advises employers and management in employment and labor law matters.
Ms. Orr has an ever-growing practice in Alternative Dispute ...
Add a comment
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Employment Discrimination
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Human Resources
- Wage & Hour
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- Employment Agreement
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Minimum Wage
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Regulatory Law
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- OSHA Issues
- Unemployment Benefits
- First Amendment
- Title VII
- Sick Leave
- Public Education
- Workplace Harassment
- At Will Employment
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Transgender Issues
- Noncompete Agreements
- Workers' Compensation
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Class Actions
- Sexual Harassment
- Civil Rights
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Tax Law
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- NLRB Finalizes Rule Broadening Joint Employer Test
- EEOC Issues New Proposed Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace
- Proposed Rule Change to Minimum Salary Requirements Would Expand Overtime Pay to Millions of Workers not Currently Eligible
- U.S. Supreme Court Bolsters Right of Employees to Request Religious Accommodations
- U.S. Supreme Court Rules Website Designer Free to Refuse Services Under First Amendment
- NLRB Restores FedEx II Standard When Factoring Workers’ Entrepreneurship
- Sixth Circuit Adopts New “Similarly Situated” Employees Evaluation Standard for Issuing Court-Approved Notice of FLSA Suits
- Unanimous Supreme Court Finds Lip Service not Good Enough for Disabled Student
- Michigan Senate Votes to Repeal 2012 Right-to-Work Law
- Michigan Appellate Court Overturns Decision on Minimum Wage, Paid Sick Leave Requirements