Normally I write about bad news for employers to keep them current on what not to do. But this time, I’m starting off the new year by turning over a new leaf and writing about Cann v Elite Plastic Products Inc, an unpublished opinion of the Michigan Court of Appeals to remind employers what they must do! You’re welcome.
In this case, the plaintiff argued that the six-month limitations period on the job application was unenforceable because it was a contract of adhesion, unfair, against public policy and unconscionable. You see, this plaintiff was fired, allegedly wrongfully, on Jan. 20, 2017 but he didn’t file his lawsuit until Jan. 16, 2020. But for the six-month limitations period on the employment application, most employment claims could have been brought within three years, and his complaint would have squeaked in just under the wire.
The plaintiff argued that the appellate court should ignore the Michigan Supreme Court’s binding decision by that court’s majority in Rory v Continental Ins Co, 473 Mich 457 (2005) and follow the decision of the dissent. Not a strong argument to make considering, well, quite frankly, the published opinion was binding!
The plaintiff also asked the appellate court to ignore its own published opinion in Clark v DaimlerChrysler Corp, 268 Mich App 138 (2005). There was no doubt that the plaintiff was going to lose. When I read opinion, I was wondering if the end game was to take the issue to the Michigan Supreme Court and ask it to reconsider the issue. Time will tell if that is the strategy.
So, bottom line, employers can still include a six-month contractual limitations period on its employment application and they should! There have been may times over the years that my clients could have had a quick victory had they included such a limitations period. Even union members can be bound by a contractual limitations period to which they agree prior to being hired and joining the union.
The key is to make sure the contractual limitations period language is written correctly, so that it can be enforced by a court. Also key is that it must be on the employment application and not in the employee handbook which generally states “nothing in this handbook creates any contractual obligations” somewhere in its introduction.
If you don’t have a limitations period spelled out on your company’s employment application, consult with an experienced employment attorney today. By tomorrow you may find you're too late!
Add a comment
Subscribe
RSSTopics
- Employment Liability
- Human Resources
- Labor Law
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Agreement
- Wage & Hour
- Employment Discrimination
- At Will Employment
- Minimum Wage
- National Labor Relations Act
- Noncompete Agreements
- Civil Rights
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- COVID-19
- Contract Employees
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Tax Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Regulatory Law
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- OSHA Issues
- Title VII
- Federal Trade Commission
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Harassment
- Contracts
- Transgender Issues
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Public Education
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Cannabis
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements
- Michigan Employers Can Legally Resist Union Organizing Efforts
- Michigan Supreme Court Decision Reinstates Previous Versions of Wage Laws
- Union Power in Michigan: Is it Real or Imagined?
- Employers Should act Now to Address Rising DOL Salary Thresholds for Exempt Employees
- Is This the end of the Employee Non-Compete Clause?