When I saw that the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled that service advisors at automobile dealerships were exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), I have to admit I was not very excited. That would be a narrow ruling, and I don’t represent any car dealerships.
But, there is something important in the decision – the five conservative justices of the court (Justices Thomas, Roberts, Kennedy, Alito and Gorsuch) expressly rejected the idea that the FLSA exemptions are to be narrowly construed. This is a big change from how the FLSA has been applied by the Department of Labor. The other four justices (Justices Ginsberg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan) sharply dissented.
An exempt employee is not entitled to overtime pay and, in a few limited professions, the employee is also exempt from minimum wage requirements. The case, Encino Motorcars, LLC v Navarro, ___ S. Ct. ___ (2018), will be helpful to employers when they defend the exempt status of an employee. This case may also provide insight into the high court’s rulings in future employment cases.
However, employers located in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee are also subject to the rulings of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit which requires employers to bear a “heightened” burden of proof, more than a preponderance (or a mere tipping of the scales of justice), when proving an employee is an exempt employee. So, while the exemption itself is no longer to be narrowly construed, the burden of proof still remains high for employers in the Sixth Circuit.
Job descriptions should be reviewed every few years because duties change and positions morph. For example, a manager who was previously classified as exempt under the executive exemption may now only manage one full time employee and is no longer eligible for the exemption. Some positions are easily assigned the status of exempt or non-exempt, but some are more difficult. Those positions should always be reviewed with experienced employment counsel.
- Senior Attorney
An attorney in the firm’s Detroit office, Claudia D. Orr exclusively represents and advises employers and management in employment and labor law matters.
Ms. Orr's clients include Fortune 500 companies, local governments ...
Add a comment
SubscribeRSS Plunkett Cooney LinkedIn Page Plunkett Cooney Twitter Page Plunkett Cooney Facebook Page
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Human Resources
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Wage & Hour
- Sick Leave
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- OSHA Issues
- Employment Discrimination
- Minimum Wage
- Emergency Information
- Title VII
- Workers' Compensation
- Employment Agreement
- Business Risk Management
- National Labor Relations Board
- Transgender Issues
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Workplace Harassment
- Class Actions
- Hostile Work Environment
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Tax Law
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- Not the Employer? You May Still be Liable!
- Are you Handling Accommodations Correctly Under the ADA?
- Labor Department Isssues Additional Guidance on Families First Cornavirus Response Act Implementation
- Labor Department Provides Families First Coronavirus Response Act Guidance
- Federal OSHA Guidelines for Employers Amid Covid-19 Pandemic
- Municipal Emergency Response Preparation for COVID-19
- Accident on Employee's Work Commute can Create Valid Workers' Comp Claim
- Coordinating Employee Leaves of Absence
- Department of Labor Publishes Final 'Joint Employer' Regulation
- Practical Advice for Creating Effective Managers