On April 5, the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued official guidance on how the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) can protect individuals with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) from discrimination.
The guidance also includes examples to help individuals and employers navigate difficult scenarios involving opioid and other substance use disorders.
The ADA provides civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities and guarantees that they have the same opportunities to enjoy employment opportunities, participate in state and local government programs, and purchase goods and services. The ADA accomplishes this by prohibiting discrimination on the basis of disability, which is defined as (1) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, including major bodily functions; (2) a record of such an impairment; or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment.
The DOJ’s guidance recognizes that individuals with OUD typically have a disability because they have a drug addiction that substantially limits one or more of their major life activities, and drug addiction is considered a physical or mental impairment under the ADA. The ADA’s protection extends to individuals who are in recovery, as well as those who have a history of OUD but no longer use drugs illegally. Additionally, the ADA protects individuals who are regarded as having an opioid use disorder, whether or not they actually do, and individuals who have a known association or relationship with an individual with a disability based on OUD.
However, the main exception to the ADA in this context is it does not provide legal protection to individuals who are engaged in current illegal drug use when an entity takes action against them because of that illegal drug use. Current illegal use of drugs means illegal drugs use that occurred recently enough to justify a reasonable belief that a person’s drug use is current or that continuing use is a real and ongoing problem. Illegal drug use does not include taking a medication under the supervision of a licensed health care professional.
It is always advisable to consult your employment attorney before taking action on situations involving the ADA and/or OUD in the workplace.
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Labor Law
- At Will Employment
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Wage & Hour
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Arbitration
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Minimum Wage
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- COVID-19
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Noncompete Agreements
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Civil Rights
- Contract Employees
- Regulatory Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Title VII
- Earned Sick Time
- OSHA Issues
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Tax Law
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Workplace Harassment
- Transgender Issues
- Unemployment Benefits
- Contracts
- Federal Trade Commission
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Business Risk Management
- Hostile Work Environment
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Public Education
- Cannabis
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements




