On Tuesday, the Michigan Senate approved legislation to repeal the state’s “right-to-work” law, which has been in place since 2012.
The “right-to-work” law prohibits union-security agreements, which required private and/or public employees to pay union dues or services fees as a condition of obtaining or continuing employment. Employees in unionized jobs who opted out of the union are still afforded rights and benefits as members of the bargaining unit.
The bill will now return to the House for a vote before it goes to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for her signature. By all accounts, Governor Whitmer has indicated she will sign the bill into law. Once passed, the legislation will go into effect 90 days after the Legislature adjourns this year.
As a result, private sector labor unions will be able to require all workers they represent to pay membership dues or an equivalent amount of fees.
Unionized and non-unionized employers should take note of this decision. Under the new law, for workers who do not want to join a union but who work at a union shop that requires fee payment as a condition of employment, those workers will be required to pay the fees or leave their job.
Unionized employers should also be prepared to recruit new employees to fill those vacancies. Additionally, all employers, including non-unionized employers, should anticipate greater unionization and bargaining efforts by their workforce, as well as unions, which will have expanded operating budgets due to the legislation.
Before the law goes into effect, employers should consult legal counsel to understand their rights and responsibilities under the new pro-union framework.
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Wage & Hour
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Minimum Wage
- At Will Employment
- National Labor Relations Act
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- COVID-19
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Coronavirus
- National Labor Relations Board
- No Tax on Overtime
- Overtime
- Payroll
- Noncompete Agreements
- Arbitration
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Regulatory Law
- Title VII
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Civil Rights
- OSHA Issues
- Contract Employees
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Tax Law
- Earned Sick Time
- Workplace Harassment
- Transgender Issues
- Contracts
- Unemployment Benefits
- Federal Trade Commission
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Cannabis
- Public Education
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Diversity
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Department of Labor Proposes Rule Altering Joint Employer Analysis
- Federal Policy Favors Arbitration but Poor Drafting Derails Enforcement
- An Employers Guide to New OBBBA Overtime Reporting Requirements
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules




