The Michigan Supreme Court’s July 31 opinion in Mothering Justice v. Attorney General sparked a host of questions about existing sick leave policies, the minimum wage, and the future of the “tipped employee credit,” among others.
On Sept 18, the state’s high court clarified aspects of its opinion regarding the minimum wage.
First, the Supreme Court clarified the schedule for increasing the minimum wage and phasing out the credit for tipped workers. Beginning Feb. 21, the minimum hourly wage will be $10.00 plus the state treasurer’s inflation adjustment, with July 31, 2024 serving as the endpoint for that calculation. Meanwhile the tipped workers’ minimum wage will increase to 48% of the general minimum wage. By Feb. 21, 2030, the phase-in schedule contemplated by the Wage Act will be complete, and tipped employees must be paid 100% of the general minimum wage by that time.
Second, in response to questions by the Michigan Attorney General and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s administration, the Supreme Court clarified that adjustments to the minimum wage and applicable percentages for tipped workers will occur on February 21st of each year—not January 1st—beginning in 2025 and concluding in 2030.
Finally, concerning the inflation adjustments necessary for determining the minimum wage set to take effect on Feb. 21, 2025, the court confirmed that the inflationary period to consider is Jan. 1, 2019 through July 31, 2024. The high court reiterated that the state treasurer has until Nov. 1, 2024 to complete that assessment.
Meanwhile, with February 2025 on the horizon, lawmakers have introduced a bill (Senate Bill No. 991) that, if enacted, would considerably scale back the wage increases set to take effect while maintaining the tipped worker credit. On Sept. 11, 2024, that bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Labor, where attorneys from Plunkett Cooney will continue to monitor its progress.
- Associate
Erik G. Bradberry is a member of Plunkett Cooney's Labor & Employment Law Practice Group who exclusively defends the interests of employers in litigation and advises them on labor relations and workplace-related regulatory ...
Add a comment
Subscribe
RSSTopics
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Employment Discrimination
- Wage & Hour
- Minimum Wage
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Employment Agreement
- National Labor Relations Act
- Civil Rights
- Noncompete Agreements
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Human Resources
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- At Will Employment
- Contract Employees
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- COVID-19
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Tax Law
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- Regulatory Law
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- OSHA Issues
- Title VII
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Harassment
- Contracts
- Transgender Issues
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Public Education
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Cannabis
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements
- Michigan Employers Can Legally Resist Union Organizing Efforts
- Michigan Supreme Court Decision Reinstates Previous Versions of Wage Laws
- Union Power in Michigan: Is it Real or Imagined?
- Employers Should act Now to Address Rising DOL Salary Thresholds for Exempt Employees
- Is This the end of the Employee Non-Compete Clause?
- Tax Considerations When Settling an Employment Claim 2.0
- DOL Finalizes Rule Tightening Independent Contractor Test