The Michigan Supreme Court’s July 31 opinion in Mothering Justice v. Attorney General sparked a host of questions about existing sick leave policies, the minimum wage, and the future of the “tipped employee credit,” among others.
On Sept 18, the state’s high court clarified aspects of its opinion regarding the minimum wage.
First, the Supreme Court clarified the schedule for increasing the minimum wage and phasing out the credit for tipped workers. Beginning Feb. 21, the minimum hourly wage will be $10.00 plus the state treasurer’s inflation adjustment, with July 31, 2024 serving as the endpoint for that calculation. Meanwhile the tipped workers’ minimum wage will increase to 48% of the general minimum wage. By Feb. 21, 2030, the phase-in schedule contemplated by the Wage Act will be complete, and tipped employees must be paid 100% of the general minimum wage by that time.
Second, in response to questions by the Michigan Attorney General and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s administration, the Supreme Court clarified that adjustments to the minimum wage and applicable percentages for tipped workers will occur on February 21st of each year—not January 1st—beginning in 2025 and concluding in 2030.
Finally, concerning the inflation adjustments necessary for determining the minimum wage set to take effect on Feb. 21, 2025, the court confirmed that the inflationary period to consider is Jan. 1, 2019 through July 31, 2024. The high court reiterated that the state treasurer has until Nov. 1, 2024 to complete that assessment.
Meanwhile, with February 2025 on the horizon, lawmakers have introduced a bill (Senate Bill No. 991) that, if enacted, would considerably scale back the wage increases set to take effect while maintaining the tipped worker credit. On Sept. 11, 2024, that bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Labor, where attorneys from Plunkett Cooney will continue to monitor its progress.
- Associate
The Leader of Plunkett Cooney's Labor & Employment Law Practice Group, Erik G. Bradberry exclusively defends the interests of employers in litigation and advises them on labor relations and workplace-related regulatory ...
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Labor Law
- At Will Employment
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Wage & Hour
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Arbitration
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Minimum Wage
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- COVID-19
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Noncompete Agreements
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Civil Rights
- Contract Employees
- Regulatory Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Title VII
- Earned Sick Time
- OSHA Issues
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Tax Law
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Workplace Harassment
- Transgender Issues
- Unemployment Benefits
- Contracts
- Federal Trade Commission
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Business Risk Management
- Hostile Work Environment
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Public Education
- Cannabis
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements





