Back in July, I reported on the oral arguments before the Michigan Supreme Court in In re Advisory Opinion on 2018 PA 368 & 369. As you will recall, the Supreme Court was asked to advise on whether the “adopt and amend” process utilized by the Michigan Legislature with regard to the Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA) and the Improved Workforce Opportunity Act was constitutional.
I would have thought that the Supreme Court would have weighed in by now, given it held oral argument during the middle of its summer break. I can only guess that there will be a strong dissent opinion and perhaps some separate concurrence opinions. Hopefully, the Supreme Court will issue an advisory opinion soon.
But, what should employers be doing now that 2019 is coming to an end? Unlike the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which becomes an issue when an employee indicates his or her need for a leave of absence, the PMLA grants most every non-exempt employee who worked, on average, 25 or more hours a week during the immediately preceding calendar year, 40 hours of paid time off that can be used for the purposes identified in the act.
So, this is just a reminder to audit your employee’s hours for 2019. Some employees who have been treated as full-time may no longer qualify if they took time off under the FMLA, for example. More importantly, other employees who were thought to be part-time, may have worked sufficient hours to become eligible for paid leave under the PMLA. So, run a report and make sure that you are applying the PMLA correctly as you head into 2020. Of course, this might all change when the Supreme Court rules!
PS, don’t forget that the Fair Labor Standards Act’s new regulations for the white collar exemptions take effect in a couple of weeks as well. So, in case you are wondering what you can do over the holidays, consider auditing your exempt employees’ salaries to ensure they can still be treated as exempt!
Yep, employment law – it’s the gift that keeps on giving!
- Senior Attorney
An attorney in the firm’s Detroit office, Claudia D. Orr exclusively represents and advises employers and management in employment and labor law matters.
Ms. Orr's clients include Fortune 500 companies, local governments ...
Add a comment
SubscribeRSS Plunkett Cooney LinkedIn Page Plunkett Cooney Twitter Page Plunkett Cooney Facebook Page
- Human Resources
- Employment Liability
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Employment Agreement
- Labor Law
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Employment Discrimination
- Wage & Hour
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Title VII
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Workplace Harassment
- Regulatory Law
- Workers' Compensation
- National Labor Relations Act
- Sick Leave
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Minimum Wage
- OSHA Issues
- National Labor Relations Board
- Sexual Harassment
- Transgender Issues
- Civil Rights
- Non-compete Agreements
- Social Media
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Retail Liability
- Emergency Information
- Business Risk Management
- Class Actions
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Hostile Work Environment
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Tax Law
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- ‘VACC To Normal’ Means Back to the Office for Michigan Starting May 24
- Michigan Pushes to Pandemic Finish Line by Promoting Double Vaccine Benefit
- Contractual Limitations Periods and Federal Civil Rights Claims
- Remote Work Still Required Amid Covid-19 Surge in Michigan
- DOL Opinion Letter Withdrawals Continue Under Biden Administration
- Worker’s Comp Coverage Would Have Been A Good Thing for This Employer
- Important COVID-19 Updates for Michigan Employers
- What Employers Can Do to Protect Themselves, Employees in Age of Digital Harassment
- New Pact to Trigger Inter-Department Consultation
- Garnishment Error Results In Employer’s Debt