Back in July, I reported on the oral arguments before the Michigan Supreme Court in In re Advisory Opinion on 2018 PA 368 & 369. As you will recall, the Supreme Court was asked to advise on whether the “adopt and amend” process utilized by the Michigan Legislature with regard to the Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA) and the Improved Workforce Opportunity Act was constitutional.
I would have thought that the Supreme Court would have weighed in by now, given it held oral argument during the middle of its summer break. I can only guess that there will be a strong dissent opinion and perhaps some separate concurrence opinions. Hopefully, the Supreme Court will issue an advisory opinion soon.
But, what should employers be doing now that 2019 is coming to an end? Unlike the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which becomes an issue when an employee indicates his or her need for a leave of absence, the PMLA grants most every non-exempt employee who worked, on average, 25 or more hours a week during the immediately preceding calendar year, 40 hours of paid time off that can be used for the purposes identified in the act.
So, this is just a reminder to audit your employee’s hours for 2019. Some employees who have been treated as full-time may no longer qualify if they took time off under the FMLA, for example. More importantly, other employees who were thought to be part-time, may have worked sufficient hours to become eligible for paid leave under the PMLA. So, run a report and make sure that you are applying the PMLA correctly as you head into 2020. Of course, this might all change when the Supreme Court rules!
PS, don’t forget that the Fair Labor Standards Act’s new regulations for the white collar exemptions take effect in a couple of weeks as well. So, in case you are wondering what you can do over the holidays, consider auditing your exempt employees’ salaries to ensure they can still be treated as exempt!
Yep, employment law – it’s the gift that keeps on giving!
- Of Counsel
An of counsel attorney in the firm’s Detroit office, Claudia D. Orr exclusively represents and advises employers and management in employment and labor law matters.
Ms. Orr has an ever-growing practice in Alternative Dispute ...
Add a comment
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Employment Discrimination
- Human Resources
- Minimum Wage
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Wage & Hour
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Employment Agreement
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Regulatory Law
- OSHA Issues
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- Title VII
- Sick Leave
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Noncompete Agreements
- Workplace Harassment
- Department of Justice
- National Labor Relations Board
- Medicare Issues
- Transgender Issues
- Workers' Compensation
- Unemployment Benefits
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Sexual Harassment
- Civil Rights
- Class Actions
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Tax Law
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- Court Delays Ruling on Fate of Michigan’s Paid Sick Leave, Minimum Wage Laws Until February 2023
- Michigan Supreme Court Affirms State’s Civil Right Law Prohibits Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation
- DOJ Issues Guidance on ADA, Opioid Crisis Issues
- Congress Passes Law, With Retroactive Effect, to Invalidate Forced Arbitration Provisions at the Employee’s Election
- U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Implementation of Vaccine Requirement for Large Businesses
- Contractual Limitations Periods STILL Alive and Well... on job Applications!
- Federal Appellate Court Takes Brakes Off COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Carousel
- Employers: Hang on for Another Spin Around the Vaccine Mandate Carousel
- Stray Comments can Lead to Employer Liability
- President Biden's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Face Uncertain Future