The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has just issued its final rule defining and delimiting the exemptions for executive, administrative, professional, outside sales and computer employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act, wrapping up a lengthy process of what are now confirmed to be significant revisions.
Included in the rule is an increase to the standard salary level as well as the annual compensation threshold of Highly Compensated Employees (HCE) with regular increases in the future.
The increases are the result of a change in methodologies used to determine these thresholds, purportedly to allow for better screening of employees. The DOL claims that the prior standard salary level was too low, causing a number of lower-paid white-collar employees to be included in the exemption despite performing significant amounts of non-exempt work.
Similarly, the higher threshold for HCE, according to the DOL, is intended to weed out those employees who are not really performing executive, administrative or professional functions, but may, nonetheless, be deemed exempt simply because they are in high-income regions and industries. There was also a concern expressed by the DOL that the salary scale would become obsolete without an updating mechanism.
The DOL’s solution was to revise its methodologies, setting the standard salary level at the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time salaried workers in the lowest-wage Census Region (currently at the 12th percentile) and the HCE threshold at the 85th percentile (currently at the 70th).
Accordingly, on July 1, the standard salary level will increase to $844 per week (a 23% increase) and the annual compensation threshold for HCE will rise to $132,964 (a 24% increase). On January 1, 2025, the new methodologies will become fully applicable, and the thresholds will increase to $1,128 and $151,164, respectively.
Future updates will happen every three years, beginning on July 1, 2027. The DOL states that these changes “will allow for the timely, predictable, and efficient updating of the earnings thresholds.”
Employers are encouraged to review the compensation of those employees who may be impacted by the threshold changes and to consider the budgetary ramifications of making the changes, particularly for those employers who will be impacted by both increases in the same budget year. Employers are also encouraged to seek legal counsel to assist in determining the applicability of exemptions using the 2004 simplified test, the now preferred test of the DOL.
- Partner
A partner in the firm’s Flint office, Rhonda R. Stowers has an extensive litigation practice that includes general liability, governmental law, commercial liability, transportation law and real estate.
Ms. Stowers has ...
Add a comment
Topics
- Employment Liability
- Employment Discrimination
- Employment Agreement
- Labor Law
- At Will Employment
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Wage & Hour
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Arbitration
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Minimum Wage
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- National Labor Relations Act
- COVID-19
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Noncompete Agreements
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- Civil Rights
- Contract Employees
- Regulatory Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Title VII
- Earned Sick Time
- OSHA Issues
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Tax Law
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Workplace Harassment
- Transgender Issues
- Unemployment Benefits
- Contracts
- Federal Trade Commission
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Business Risk Management
- Hostile Work Environment
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Public Education
- Cannabis
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Federal Court Rules State Discrimination Claims Subject to Mandatory Arbitration
- Are Boilerplate Terms in Employment Applications Enforceable?
- Is Your Business Ready for Pay Transparency Laws?
- Supreme Court Resolves Circuit Split in Reverse Discrimination Cases
- Michigan Legislature Avoids Chaos by Amending Earned Sick Time Act Just Prior to Deadline
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements





