Labor Law Series
You may be shocked as a Michigan business, operating in the home of the United Autoworkers and of the Teamsters, that unions are increasingly less relevant. That does not mean, however, that if you are currently union free you can suddenly relax!
Historically unionization required 30% of your employees to sign union authorization cards or a petition to force a secret ballot election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board to determine if a union should represent your employees.
But hold the presses! Since August 2023, the Biden, pro-union National Labor Relations Board, has ruled that even if your company “wins” an NLRB election (to remain union free), the NLRB can still overturn the results and order your company to start bargaining immediately with the “losing” union!
On June 17,2024 the Biden NLRB issues its first post-CEMEX decision, Red Rock Casino, 373 NLRB No. 67, ordering Red Rock to bargain with the Union – even though the company won the election by almost 100 votes!
How can this happen in America? What can you do? How should you prepare? We’ll discuss that in Part 2. You’ll need to read this!
- Partner
With 50 years of experience helping companies, contractors, employers, lawmakers and trade associations, Frank T. Mamat is one of the most experienced members of the firm's Labor & Employment Law Practice Group.
A partner in ...
Add a comment
Subscribe
RSSTopics
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Human Resources
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Employment Agreement
- Wage & Hour
- Employment Discrimination
- At Will Employment
- National Labor Relations Act
- Minimum Wage
- Noncompete Agreements
- Civil Rights
- National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
- COVID-19
- Contract Employees
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- National Labor Relations Board
- Coronavirus
- Tax Law
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Regulatory Law
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- OSHA Issues
- Title VII
- Federal Trade Commission
- Civil Litigation
- Settlements
- Retaliation
- Sick Leave
- Unemployment Benefits
- Workplace Harassment
- Contracts
- Transgender Issues
- Accommodations
- First Amendment
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Public Education
- ERISA
- Workers' Compensation
- Cannabis
- Department of Justice
- Medicare Issues
- LGBTQ
- Class Actions
- Sexual Harassment
- Garnishments
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- RICO
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Diversity
- Union Organizing & Relations
Recent Updates
- Implementing the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Key Insights for Employers
- Federal Court Throws out DOL’s Attempt to Rewrite White Collar Overtime Rules
- Civil Rights Litigation Filed by Christian Employers Gets New Life Following Federal Appellate Court Ruling
- Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Wage Decision
- Judge Strikes Down Federal Ban on Non-compete Agreements
- Michigan Employers Can Legally Resist Union Organizing Efforts
- Michigan Supreme Court Decision Reinstates Previous Versions of Wage Laws
- Union Power in Michigan: Is it Real or Imagined?
- Employers Should act Now to Address Rising DOL Salary Thresholds for Exempt Employees
- Is This the end of the Employee Non-Compete Clause?