The latest update to the ongoing saga of President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandates and the revolving door treatment of them in the federal district and appellate courts just took another spin, at least with respect to the CMS mandate for health care workers.
A quick history to date of the vaccine mandate path to taking effect:
- September - President Biden announced sweeping vaccine mandates to get most working Americans vaccinated through executive orders and rules published by federal agencies including:
- Through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for all employees who work for employers with 100 or more employees
- Through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), such as hospitals, home health agencies, community mental health centers and federally qualified health clinics, as well as the volunteers, trainees and contractors who supply services to these entities where patients and their families may be present
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a stay on Nov. 12 for the OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS), and the cases challenging this rule have been consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, with the stay remaining in place for the time being
- The CMS rule was challenged in St. Louis, Missouri and on Nov. 29, a federal district court judge blocked CMS from enforcing the vaccine mandate against the 10 states that brought the case (which did not include Michigan, Ohio, Indiana or Illinois)
- The following day, Nov. 30, a second case challenging the CMS rule was successful in getting a federal judge in Louisiana to enter a stay of the CMS mandate for the entire country
Yesterday, the Fifth Circuit issued a ruling in the appeal of the sweeping CMS stay out of Louisiana, upholding the stay for the 14 states (including Indiana and Ohio) that brought that case, and overturning the stay for all but the 24 states covered as noted herein.
A Texas district court judge immediately entered a preliminary injunction against the CMS mandate in Texas, so 25 states have a pause on the CMS mandate as of today.
Michigan and Illinois are not plaintiffs in either of the cases and, therefore, the CMS rule may now be enforced in those states. CMS issued a statement on Dec. 3 advising that it wouldn’t enforce the COVID-19 vaccine mandate while the preliminary injunctions are in effect. Notably, CMS did not say what it would do if the preliminary injunctions are stayed, as happened yesterday.
In addition, the Sixth Circuit yesterday, voted 8 to 8 declining to hear the OSHA ETS challenges “en banc,” meaning it will go to a three-judge panel rather than the entire bench, at least initially.
This is an evolving situation, and it is very likely the federal government will appeal the injunctions to the U.S. Supreme Court soon.
In the meantime, employers subject to the CMS vaccine mandate should put policies in place in anticipation that enforcement could begin shortly.
Employers need to stay current on the vaccine mandates that affect their business and the CDC guidance as well. It is important to work closely with your legal counsel to stay up to date on the quickly changing rules and requirements.
- Senior Attorney
Laura M. Dinon has been a member of Plunkett Cooney since 1979. After graduating from the Detroit College of Law in 1988, she began practicing in the Detroit office, concentrating in the area of professional liability.
Add a comment
- Employment Liability
- Labor Law
- Wage & Hour
- Human Resources
- Employment Agreement
- Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Employment Discrimination
- Minimum Wage
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
- Department of Labor (DOL)
- Whistleblower Protection Act
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Unemployment Benefits
- Public Education
- Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA)
- Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
- Regulatory Law
- OSHA Issues
- National Labor Relations Act
- At Will Employment
- Title VII
- Sick Leave
- Workplace Harassment
- National Labor Relations Board
- Hostile Work Environment
- Business Risk Management
- Noncompete Agreements
- Transgender Issues
- Department of Justice
- Workers' Compensation
- Medicare Issues
- Class Actions
- Sexual Harassment
- Civil Rights
- Social Media
- Retail Liability
- Emergency Information
- Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
- Department of Education (DOE)
- Title IX
- Tax Law
- Medical Marijuana
- Right to Work
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- Union Organizing & Relations
- Unanimous Supreme Court Finds Lip Service not Good Enough for Disabled Student
- Michigan Senate Votes to Repeal 2012 Right-to-Work Law
- Michigan Appellate Court Overturns Decision on Minimum Wage, Paid Sick Leave Requirements
- Michigan Supreme Court Ruling Could Result in High Exposure Claims Against Employers
- FTC Proposes Ban on All Employer Noncompete Agreements
- Court Delays Ruling on Fate of Michigan’s Paid Sick Leave, Minimum Wage Laws Until February 2023
- Michigan Supreme Court Affirms State’s Civil Right Law Prohibits Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation
- DOJ Issues Guidance on ADA, Opioid Crisis Issues
- Congress Passes Law, With Retroactive Effect, to Invalidate Forced Arbitration Provisions at the Employee’s Election
- U.S. Supreme Court Temporarily Blocks Implementation of Vaccine Requirement for Large Businesses