What is the amount of wage-loss benefits allowed under the Michigan No-Fault Act? That depends.
On Aug. 9, the director of the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services announced changes to the new work loss and survivors’ loss benefits payable, effective Oct. 1, 2021 through Sept. 30, 2022.
The benefits, which are a part of Michigan's personal protection insurance (PIP) No-Fault benefits, will increase to $6,065 per a single 30-day period. This maximum shall apply pro rata to any lesser period of work loss.
The maximum work loss and survivor’s loss benefits for the previous year (Oct. 1, 2020 through Sept. 30, 2021) was $5,755 per a single 30-day period. This is an increase of $11,160 over three years and an increase of $310 per month (or 30-day period).
Like in prior years, the benefits have a three-year cap from the anniversary date of the date of loss and must be supported by reasonable proof of the fact and of the amount of loss, which requires legitimate restrictions or limitations that prevent a claimant from working and which must be supported by written documentation from a licensed medical provider, along with proof demonstrating actual wage loss because of the accident.
A link to the director’s bulletin can be found by clicking here.
A partner in the firm's Bloomfield Hills office, Abe Barlaskar concentrates his litigation practice on defending insurers and personal line carriers, rental car companies, trucking companies, corporations and municipalities ...
Add a comment
- No Fault Liability
- Auto Liability
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Trucking Liability
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP)
- Premises Liability
- Fraud Activity
- Judicial Estoppel
- Retail Liability
- Driver Exclusion
- insurance policy
- Cargo Liability
- Risk Management
- Public Policy
- Governmental Immunity
- Environmental Legislation
- Environmental Regulation
- Medicare Issues
- Amidst Pandemic, Work-Loss Benefits Increase Under Michigan No-Fault Act
- Defending Against Fraudulent Claims Following Michigan Supreme Court’s Ruling in Meemic v Fortson
- Michigan Expands Chiropractic Coverage Under No-Fault Act
- Arbitration is a Road Less Traveled but one Worthy of Consideration for UM/UIM Claims
- Truck Driver’s Bodily Injury Claim barred by his Bankruptcy Case
- Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association Slashes 2020-2021 Fee Assessments
- What the No-Fault Act Giveth the No-Fault Act can Taketh Away
- Appellate Court Upholds Dismissal of Vacationer’s PIP Claims for Fraud
- Court Reaffirms One Year Back Rule, Rejects Use of Consent to Treat Forms as Assignments
- Once Again, More Fees for Michigan Drivers