Posts from January 2016.
Appellate court reverses trial court ruling favoring bar owner in premises liability case, and in so doing, creates notice and open and obvious doctrine questions of fact.
Comments
Topics
- Civil Litigation
- Premises Liability
- Product Liability
- Food Law
- Foodservice & Hospitality
- Property Liability
- Consumer Liability
- Consumer Protection
- Retail Liability
- Litigation Discovery
- Negligence
- Insurance
- Residential Liability
- Fire Claims
- Appellate Law
- Contractor Liability
- Damages Recovery
- General Liability
- Construction Contractors
- Construction Law
- Commercial Liability
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Commercial Real Estate
- Water Loss Claims
- Snow & Ice Claims
- Open & Obvious Doctrine
- Personal Injury
- insurance policy
- Fraud Activity
- Investigations
- Governmental Immunity
- Contracts
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Risk Management
- Open & Obvious
- Business Risk Management
- Marine Liability
- Maritime Law
- Artificial Intelligence
- Liquor Liability
- Design Defect
- Industrial Liability
- Lost Earnings
- Video Recording
- Defamation
- Professional Liability
- Independent Medical Examinations (IME)
- Sports-liability
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Auto Liability
- Bankruptcy
- Intoxication
- Judicial Estoppel
- No Fault Liability
- Trucking Liability
- Wrongful Death
- Real Estate
- FDA Regulations
- Regulatory Law
- Constructive Notice
Recent Updates
- Who is Left Holding the Bag When a Parasite Hits the Lettuce Supply Chain?
- Product Liability Risk Management for e-Bikes and Scooters
- The Missing Feature: When ‘Doing Nothing’ Becomes the Product Liability Theory
- America’s 250th Birthday Celebration Poses Old and New Products Liability Risks
- Is Social Media the Next Frontier in Products Liability Defense?
- Spring Cleaning – Know Your Duties With Snow, Ice Liability
- What damages are recoverable in Michigan when property is negligently damaged or destroyed?
- Businesses can Bolster Lack of Notice Defense by Documenting Premises Inspections
- Avoiding the Premises Liability Trap of ‘Lost’ Evidence
- Appellate Court Faults Construction Company for Halting Work for Nonpayment in Breach of Agreed Upon Contract