Posts in Litigation Discovery.
Investigating a plaintiff’s prior suits may reveal contrary positions barring a claim through judicial estoppel.
Tags: Auto Liability, Bankruptcy, Judicial Estoppel, Litigation Discovery, Motor Vehicle Liability, No Fault Liability, Premises Liability, Residential Liability, Retail Liability, Trucking Liability
Comments
Discovery will change dramatically under a new Michigan Supreme Court rule requiring judges to be “participant observers” in a more collaborative civil litigation process.
Tags: Litigation Discovery
Subscribe
RSS Plunkett Cooney LinkedIn Page Plunkett Cooney Twitter Page Plunkett Cooney Facebook PageTopics
- Premises Liability
- Residential Liability
- General Liability
- Sports-liability
- Retail Liability
- Commercial Real Estate
- Litigation Discovery
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Liquor Liability
- Open & Obvious Doctrine
- Snow & Ice Claims
- Open & Obvious
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Civil Litigation
- Commercial Liability
- Auto Liability
- Bankruptcy
- Judicial Estoppel
- No Fault Liability
- Trucking Liability
- Intoxication
- Wrongful Death
- Risk Management
- Business Risk Management
- Real Estate
- FDA Regulations
- Food Law
- Foodservice & Hospitality
- Regulatory Law
- Constructive Notice
- Governmental Immunity
Recent Updates
- Appellate Court Holds Sporting Event Rules Violations Not Necessarily Reckless Misconduct
- Warehouse Clubs Should Consider Arbitration for Member Disputes
- Truck Driver’s Bodily Injury Claim Barred by his Bankruptcy Case
- Intoxication Bars College Student’s Estate from Wrongful Death Action
- New Supreme Court Discovery Rule Places Emphasis on Proportionality Over Relevance
- Court Reinforces Principle That Landowners Generally Have no Duty to Prevent Criminal Acts
- Don't Drink and File... a Lawsuit
- Michigan Court of Appeals Affirms Black Ice Remains Open and Obvious
- Phantom Employees Create a 'Question of Fact' for Notice Defense
- Social Media can Derail Defense of Your Premises Liability Case