Michigan Supreme Court gives premises owners early holiday present, ruling “reasonable inspection” not required in slip and fall claim.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

This final installment of our four-part incident documentation series takes a look at the power of surveillance video and photos... or the lack thereof.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Part three of this four-part premises liability series focuses on the strategic issues one should consider when collecting witness statements as part of an incident report procedure.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

In this second part of our four-part series on premises liability documentation, we take a look at the importance of detailed incident reports as a means for defending against a plaintiff's slip, trip and fall claim.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Proper incident inspections are the focus of this post, which is the first in a four-part series on premises liability documentation best practices.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Appellate court reverses trial court ruling favoring bar owner in premises liability case, and in so doing, creates notice and open and obvious doctrine questions of fact.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

The Michigan Supreme Court recently doubled-down on the plain meaning of "open and obvious" in premises liability claims by reversing two lower appellate court rulings.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Implementing a surveillance video retention policy can help businesses defend against premises liability claims.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

A recent ruling by the Michigan Court of Appeals further clarifies the proper use of Grandberry-Lovette v Garascia in premises liability cases where constructive notice is at issue.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Appellate court rules school bus driver may be grossly negligent for decision to divert from normal route to "treat" students to an extra bumpy ride, resulting in injuries.

CommentsComments Share: Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Email

Topics

Recent Updates

Plunkett Cooney Blogs

Plunkett Cooney Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek