- Posts by Bryan A. Janes
AssociateBryan A. Janes is a member of the firm’s Transportation Law, Construction Law and Torts & Litigation practice groups. He focuses his practice on the defense of motor vehicle negligence, commercial trucking liability ...
This Michigan Court of appeals ruling confirms that the fee schedule under MCL 500.3157 applies to third-party claims and that a plaintiff has a duty to mitigate its damages.
Comments
Michigan Court of Appeals reverses case evaluation sanction award in lawsuit that predates amendment to state’s court rules.
Tags: Civil Litigation, Sanctions
Topics
- Motor Vehicle Liability
- Trucking Liability
- No Fault Liability
- Cargo Liability
- Civil Litigation
- Artificial Intelligence
- Transportation
- Auto Liability
- Personal Injury Protection (PIP)
- Appellate Law
- Insurance
- Fraud Activity
- Underinsured Motorist Insurance (UIM)
- Negligence
- insurance policy
- Sanctions
- Premises Liability
- Coronavirus
- COVID-19
- Driver Exclusion
- Judicial Estoppel
- Retail Liability
- Bankruptcy
- Risk Management
- Governmental Immunity
- Medicare Issues
Recent Updates
- How Truck Driver Monitoring with AI Technology is Reshaping Accident Litigation
- Ruling Clarifies Application of Michigan No-Fault Act’s Fee Schedule for Motorcycle Accident Claims Regardless of When Policy was Issued
- Michigan Supreme Court Denies Plaintiff’s Push to Retroactively Apply Amended No-Fault Act
- Michigan Appeals Court Affirms Key Limits on Underinsured Motorist Coverage
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Limits Scope of Preemption Governing Freight Broker’s Selection of Motor Carrier
- Fee Schedule Applies to Third-Party Claims for Excess Allowable Expenses
- Appellate Court Rules Insured Entitled to Unlimited Attendant Care Benefits
- Case Update: Appellate Court Updates Recent Decision to Published Status, Expanding Definition of ‘Unlawful’ Under Michigan PIP Law
- Having a ‘Cowboy Attitude' About No-Fault Insurance Limits Could Cost You
- How well do you Know Your Policyholders? Recent Appellate Case Encourages Full Discovery of Potential Rescission During Litigation